Volume 53, March 2016CEMRACS 2014 – Numerical Modeling of Plasmas
|Page(s)||248 - 270|
|Published online||01 April 2016|
1 Maison de la Simulation, CEA, CNRS,
Univ. Paris-Sud, UVSQ, Universit Paris-Saclay, 91191
2 CEA, IRFM, F-13108 Saint-Paul-lez-Durance
Reproducibility of results is a strong requirement in most fields of research for experimental results to be called science. For results obtained through simulation software using high performance computing (HPC) this translates as code quality requirements. While there are many works focusing on software quality, these typically do not take the specificities of HPC scientific simulation softwareinto account. This paper presents an approach to introduce quality procedures in HPC scientific simulation softwarewhile remaining the less invasive as possible so as to ease its adoption. The approach relies on quality procedures including human code review and automated testing and offers a dedicated procedure to help correct defects found this way. These procedures are integrated in a development work-flow designed to improve the traceability of defects. By implementing this approach for the development of the Gysela code, we show that it is indeed viable and that the return on investment is positive. We also identify multiple reusable elements developed for this experiment that should reduce the cost of adopting the approach for other codes as well as some aspects that can still be improved to ensure a widespread propagation of the approach in the community.
We would like to thank the Inria Continuous Integration platform (https://ci.inria.fr) team for their support
© EDP Sciences, SMAI 2016
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.